After the opening round of the Six Nations, I felt France impressed me most in their attack and today I read a great assessment of it by former England coach Brian Ashton. His wise words of wisdom tell the full story, so I won’t bother adding my own in this post. If you’re keen to learn more from a master of open, running rugby, then check out his blog here: Brian Ashton’s Blog
Here’s what he said about the French performance last weekend:
If England’s was the best victory of the opening round, it was France who delivered the best attacking performance. I assume Andy Robinson is still mightily annoyed at the soft turnovers conceded by his Scotland team, but it was no small thing for them to score three good tries of their own. It was just that Les Bleus operated at a different level when the force was with them. In doing so, they highlighted the great virtues that underpin their way of introducing young players to, and developing their talent for, the sport of rugby union.
Go down the traditional Anglo-Saxon instructional road – set out the cones, the tackle shields, the body suits; repeat the drill-based practice sessions ad nauseam – and you produce players who are strong technically but have little in the way of invention and still less understanding of the flow of the dynamic game. Approach things in the games-based, laissez-faire style favoured by the French and you end up with players with the capacity to adapt to, and exploit, the widest range of situations.
Two elements of the French performance in Paris showed this. Firstly, they showed a precious ability to use turnover ball to immediate advantage. At one point, Scotland had a turnover of their own, but kicked to the French, who showed their gratitude by scoring a try. But how often do we see this in today’s game? All too rarely. Receiving turnover possession in broken field, where the field of play is in chaos, should be the stuff of dreams, but not every one grasps the principles of attack as completely as the French.
Secondly, they demonstrated a high level of understanding of how to create and attack space and keep the ball alive in a variety of channels while changing flow and tempo at will. This goes back to the way the French practise from a very young age, concentrating as they do on the subtlety of their running lines, the weight and length of their passing, the variations in their offloads, the appreciation of when to go tight on the drive, on how to “read” a defence.
The glory of it is that their forwards do all this, as well as their backs. William Servat and Thomas Domingo showed against the Scots that they were proficient in the art (not the science!) of rugby. Not for them the easy option of going to ground as a first option, thereby playing into the hands of the opposition. They did something much more positive, more challenging and, ultimately, more exhilarating.
Brian Ashton; 12 Feb., 2011
Here are highlights of that match. One thing that I will add is to note how they keep the ball alive and how active and ready the supporting players are! Okay, one more thing as I re-watch it … note how when the French player grubbered the ball through for Medard’s try, he’d committed the defence. In stark contrast, the Scotsman who attempted the same didn’t commit anyone and didn’t recognise that the French had any kick option well covered – which, along with their great handling, led to their counter attack try. I love a risky offload or kick ahead, but they MUST be the intelligent and called-for option, not a “I’ve got no other ideas, so let’s do this and hope” one.